【題目大意】運動員可否用禁藥(文章支持、聽力反對)
【題目試寫】
In this set of materials, the reading passage states why PEDs should be allowed for athletes to use. However, the listening passage casts doubt on the information provided in the reading passage.
First, the reading passage indicates that the used of PEDs can make athletes have better performance. Yet, the listening passage explains that the used of PEDs needs law to stipulate because there is no research to verify.
Second, the reading passage describes that the used of PEDs is a free decision. Nevertheless, the listening passage claims that it is a potential dangerous action.
Finally, the reading passage mentions that the used of PEDs for athletes is allowed, or it will propose an unfair advantage to poor athletes, while the listening passage explains that it will make the sports lose competitiveness.
In conclusion, the article and the lecture hold contrary perspectives toward why PEDs should be allowed for athletes to use.
字數:152
註:
1.螢光筆處為可背誦之片語或文法~
2.試寫內容:自行創作,非抄襲其他文章
留言列表